1000 families project chris chantel myron penelope fitzwilliam natalie and mikey

1,000 Families Project: Chris, Chantel, Myron, Penelope, Fitzwilliam, Natalie and Mikey

In an excellent example of “conscious uncoupling,” this dad’s super amicable relationship with his ex means she’ll often babysit their eight-month-old when he and his wife need a hand.

It was a Sunday, which was great, except I had to work, which was not great. Plus, my wife, Chantel, also had some work to do. Usually when we’re doing the computer typing thing, the two older kids (Myron, age 8, and Penny, age 6) can play with their baby brother, with us checking in anytime the tears get too loud.

Except the older kids were going with their mom to an old friends’ house in Whitby. They’d be gone the whole of the afternoon. That left Chantel and I with Fitzy, our eight-month-old baby, who would be hard to amuse while the two of us frowned at our computer displays.

“Hey,” I said to my ex-wife, Natalie, and her boyfriend, Mikey, when they came over to pick up the two older kids. “How do you guys feel about taking Fitzy with you out to Whitby?”

They said yes. They’re nice—I knew they would say yes. Pretty much anytime Chantel and I ask them to care for our baby, they say yes.

There are people in my circle of friends who think it’s weird that one of our primary babysitters for our little baby is my ex-wife and her boyfriend. But actually, it makes sense on about fourteen different levels.

The extra time that baby Fitz shares with his older siblings helps to create strong bonds among my three kids. It saves us the $50 or so we’d otherwise spend on paying a sitter. It gives Chantel and I time to ourselves. And the kids’ mom and her boyfriend both are excellent caregivers. They’re kind, and they love kids. What more could one ask for?

Head into the future a few years and Chantel and I may be providing the same sort of babysitting services to Natalie and Mikey—I mean, if they have children together.

All this blending prompts some questions for the kids. “You know how Chantel is our stepmom?” the kids asked one evening at dinner before Fitz was born. “Will our mom be Fitzy’s stepmom?”

Chantel and I looked at one another.

“Huh—yeah, I can see how you guys might think that,” I said. “But no, she’ll be—“ And for a second I was at a loss. I actually didn’t know what she’ll be. She’ll be around a lot. Sometimes she’ll babysit. She’ll be affectionate and hopefully she’ll love Fitzy. I said, “She’ll be more like an aunt.”

That seemed to satisfy the kids. But you know what? I wonder about this drive to define our roles by forcing them into the family categories of previous generations. The three kids, and the two sets of parents that watch over them—I’d prefer if we all ignored the preconceptions that come with “aunt” or “stepdad” or whatever role you like. It’s going to take years for us to work out exactly what we all are to one another. We may not know what we had until we look back on it, decades from now, once the kids are grown up. Until that time I guess we’ll just concentrate on trying to be there for one another. And that’s good enough for all of us.

Photo left to right: Mikey, Myron, Natalie, Penelope, Fitzwilliam, Chantel and Chris.

This is #1000families post number 49. Do you have a family story of your own to contribute to the 1,000 Families Project? Or do you know a family that might want to do so? Learn more about how the series got started and how to get involved here. You can find all of the #1000families posts here.

Please follow and like us:


Christopher Shulgan

About

Chris Shulgan is a writer and ghostwriter who lives in Toronto’s Kensington Market neighbourhood with his wife, Chantel, and his three kids. He is the dad on the parenting panel for CBC’s Steven and Chris show. Find him on Twitter @shulgan.


'1,000 Families Project: Chris, Chantel, Myron, Penelope, Fitzwilliam, Natalie and Mikey' have 5 comments

  1. Steve MC

    November 13, 2014 @ 2:27 pm Steve MC

    I haven’t heard the expression we live in a global village in a long time, but to your point, Chris, about the 14 different ways it makes sense for your families to remain close, geographically and emotionally, I say this about that: “what’s old, is new again”. I totally agree with your observation about how to “explain” – in precise terms – what Fitzy (what a great nick/name) will call Natalie. Other than for the church and state, why do we have to label our relationships?

    A few thousand years ago, when we all lived in villages, our neighbours helped us out. They knew the names of our kids, as we did theirs. We all watched, and cared for our fellow villagers. Yours is a small village that will change over time, for the better given everyone’s conscious efforts to remain amicable and together.

    Kudos to your Peeps. This is very cool IMHO.

    Steve MC

    Reply

  2. November 14, 2014 @ 10:32 pm jan

    This is an absolutely wonderful example of “making it work” ! ! !

    Reply

  3. February 8, 2016 @ 4:14 am The New Family / Podcast Episode 43: Why Parents Fear the Wrong Things - The New Family

    […] Chris’s 1,000 Families post […]

    Reply

  4. April 4, 2016 @ 4:12 am The New Family / Episode 59: Why You Need to Embrace the Sleepover Party - The New Family

    […] Chris’s 1,000 Families post […]

    Reply

  5. April 4, 2016 @ 4:12 am The New Family / Episode 59: Why You Need to Embrace the Sleepover Party - The New Family

    […] Chris’s 1,000 Families post […]

    Reply


Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.